enconf vs. Froxlor — lean, but how far?
Froxlor is a free, resource-friendly open-source panel from Germany. enconf is lean too, but adds a modern UI, multi-server, toolkits and support.
enconf delivers the same leanness (panel processes under 75 MB RAM) plus automation (toolkits, Site Doctor, Security Advisor), a modern interface and multi-server. Froxlor is free but configuration-oriented and without these automations.
Feature comparison
| Feature | enconf | Froxlor |
|---|---|---|
| License model | commercial, 14-day free trial | free (open source) |
| Modern interface | yes | functional, dated |
| Multi-server | yes | limited |
| WordPress/Joomla/PrestaShop toolkit | included | no |
| Site Doctor / auto-fixes | yes | no |
| Security Advisor | yes | manual |
| Email & DNS | yes | yes |
| Support | included | community |
| Data location / GDPR | Made in Germany | DE project |
Resources, cost & migration
Resource usage
License model
Migration effort
Frequently asked questions
Is enconf as lean as Froxlor?
Yes — the panel processes run under 75 MB RAM. On top you get automation and a modern UI that Froxlor doesn't offer.
What extra do I get with enconf?
Toolkits, Site Doctor, security evidence (SBOM/EU CRA), native multi-server management and commercial support — at an equally lean footprint. 14-day free trial.
Froxlor and related trademarks belong to Froxlor Team. enconf has no business affiliation with Froxlor Team. Information without warranty, as of 2026; competitor feature scope, editions, pricing and terms may change and should be verified with the respective vendor.
More panel comparisons
Switching to enconf?
14-day free trial — no credit card. Or try the live demo directly.